cheap toms size 11 jeans,toms shoes for sale philippines diesel

cheap toms size 11 uk,toms shoes for sale philippines price ,cheap toms size 11 vans,toms shoes for sale philippines review ,cheap toms size 11 womens,toms shoes for sale philippines rota ,cheap toms size 11 womens 8.5,toms shoes for sale philippines sulit ,cheap toms size 11 womens aqua,toms shoes for sale philippines used ,cheap toms size 11 womens australia,toms shoes for sale philippines vios ,cheap toms size 11 womens european,toms shoes for sale philippines yamaha ,cheap toms size 11 womens green,toms shoes for sale philippines zip ,cheap toms size 11 womens heels,toms shoes for sale qld ,cheap toms size 11 womens jeans,toms shoes for sale shop ,cheap toms size 11 womens jordans,toms shoes for sale shop coupon ,cheap toms size 11 womens pants,toms shoes for sale shop review ,cheap toms size 11 womens review,toms shoes for sale singapore ,cheap toms size 11 womens rings,toms shoes for sale south africa ,cheap toms size 11 womens shoes,toms shoes for sale uk ,

Management. After a year of trial, the Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court on August 22, 2014 the first instance verdict, the plaintiff, the defendant appealed to the Shanxi Provincial High Court. After more than eight months the trial, Shanxi Provincial High Court of second instance ruling on June 2, 2015, 'cassation, remand.' Shanxi Provincial High Court case after entering the second instance, the parties found illegal situation pending in the trial and in the second instance ruling upon before, and related to the Full Court has repeatedly led the Court in writing reflect questioned, but has not been any response. Until after the second trial made ruling party was forced to apply to the Shanxi procuratorate, asking for illegal happens Shanxi Provincial High Court of second instance proceedings legal supervision. Shanxi Province Procuratorate after access to the first trial, the second trial dossier to review that case, 'the second instance wrongdoing, should be supervised' on October 9, 2015 issue of up to ten thousand words 'Attorney proposals' to the Shanxi Provincial High Court. 'Attorney Recommendation' that the presence of the second instance court case three offenses, namely 'investigation in violation of laws and regulations, the trial period exceeds the statutory period, ruled that the instrument does not meet the requirements.' The 'proposal', said the first investigation and collection of evidence in violation of the 'Civil Law' provisions on court investigations to collect evidence. Before the second instance court, the Shanxi Provincial High Court application by the appellant survey collected 2 parts by evidence, by the Shanxi Provincial Procuratorate for examination in accordance with law, confirmed that the two parts of the second trial evidence neither new evidence nor the court can take the initiative to adjust ex officio evidence, and also before the transfer of the other parties did not notify law advice and evidence, violated the rights of the other party litigation; second, significantly exceeded the statutory trial period of three months concluded provisions exceed the statutory trial period more than five months 'the case has not been the case also applied for an extension of the trial period and the related approval procedures'; third, ruling only the expression 'original verdict, the basic facts are not clear,' a word of reason, contrary to the law and related regulations. 'According to the' Civil Law 'provisions of Article 208, paragraph 3, special procuratorial suggestion, I suggest you hospital (Shanxi Provincial High Court) to be corrected', 'Attorney proposal' requires that 'after receiving a recommendation Attorney